NO (ignored inputs)COMMENT COMMENT cops number: 1097 submitted by: Kiraku Shintani Rewrite Rules (1): [ c(a(?x)) -> c(c(?x)), c(c(?x)) -> a(b(?x)), a(a(?x)) -> b(c(?x)), b(a(?x)) -> c(c(?x)), c(a(?x)) -> b(a(?x)), b(c(?x)) -> a(b(?x)), c(c(?x)) -> a(b(?x)), b(c(?x)) -> c(a(?x)) ] Rewrite Rules (2): [ c(b(?x)) -> c(a(?x)), b(c(?x)) -> c(b(?x)), a(b(?x)) -> c(c(?x)), a(a(?x)) -> a(b(?x)), a(c(?x)) -> a(a(?x)), c(c(?x)) -> a(a(?x)), a(a(?x)) -> b(c(?x)), b(b(?x)) -> c(b(?x)) ] both left-linear check commutation with R1 := (1), R2 := (2) check CPs are development closed... ...failed check commutation with R1 := (2), R2 := (1) check CPs are development closed... ...failed check non-commutation check with R1 := (1), R2 := (2) check counter example from CPs... check candidate: check candidate: check candidate: check candidate: check candidate: check candidate: Counter example: c(b(?x)) <-R2- b(c(?x)) -R1-> c(a(?x)) result: not COM cops-BspABou6.trs: Success(not COM) (3 msec.)