0.00/0.00	NO
0.00/0.00	
0.00/0.00	
0.00/0.00	Succeeded in reading "/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.trs".
0.00/0.00	    (CONDITIONTYPE ORIENTED)
0.00/0.00	    (VAR x)
0.00/0.00	    (RULES
0.00/0.00	      f(x) -> a | x == b
0.00/0.00	      a -> b
0.00/0.00	      a -> c
0.00/0.00	    )
0.00/0.00	    (COMMENT doi:10.1016/j.jlap.2009.08.001 [73] Example 4 submitted by: Thomas Sternagel and Aart Middeldorp)
0.00/0.00	
0.00/0.00	No "->="-rules.
0.00/0.00	
0.00/0.00	Decomposed conditions if possible.
0.00/0.00	    (CONDITIONTYPE ORIENTED)
0.00/0.00	    (VAR x)
0.00/0.00	    (RULES
0.00/0.00	      f(x) -> a | x == b
0.00/0.00	      a -> b
0.00/0.00	      a -> c
0.00/0.00	    )
0.00/0.00	    (COMMENT doi:10.1016/j.jlap.2009.08.001 [73] Example 4 submitted by: Thomas Sternagel and Aart Middeldorp)
0.00/0.00	
0.00/0.00	Removed infeasible rules as much as possible.
0.00/0.00	    (CONDITIONTYPE ORIENTED)
0.00/0.00	    (VAR x)
0.00/0.00	    (RULES
0.00/0.00	      f(x) -> a | x == b
0.00/0.00	      a -> b
0.00/0.00	      a -> c
0.00/0.00	    )
0.00/0.00	    (COMMENT doi:10.1016/j.jlap.2009.08.001 [73] Example 4 submitted by: Thomas Sternagel and Aart Middeldorp)
0.00/0.00	
0.00/0.00	Try to disprove confluence of the following (C)TRS:
0.00/0.00	    (CONDITIONTYPE ORIENTED)
0.00/0.00	    (VAR x)
0.00/0.00	    (RULES
0.00/0.00	      f(x) -> a | x == b
0.00/0.00	      a -> b
0.00/0.00	      a -> c
0.00/0.00	    )
0.00/0.00	    (COMMENT doi:10.1016/j.jlap.2009.08.001 [73] Example 4 submitted by: Thomas Sternagel and Aart Middeldorp)
0.00/0.00	
0.00/0.00	Succeeded in disproving confluence.
0.00/0.00	
0.00/0.00	Disproved via the following (C)TRS:
0.00/0.00	(CONDITIONTYPE ORIENTED)
0.00/0.00	(VAR x)
0.00/0.00	(RULES
0.00/0.00	  f(x) -> a | x == b
0.00/0.00	  a -> b
0.00/0.00	  a -> c
0.00/0.00	)
0.00/0.00	(COMMENT doi:10.1016/j.jlap.2009.08.001 [73] Example 4 submitted by: Thomas Sternagel and Aart Middeldorp)
0.00/0.00	
0.00/0.00	NO
0.00/0.00	EOF